Why RMM and Remote Desktop Vendors Desperately Need a Code of Conduct
The statistics are difficult to ignore: RMM misuse increased by 277% in 2025, making up about 25% of all security occurrences that Huntress monitored. The risk profile of remote desktop utilities is identical. They give attackers total, direct control over a target computer, whether they are installed as standalone software or integrated natively into an RMM platform. Ironically, the very technologies designed to maintain the seamless operation of business infrastructure are now the first things hackers look for.
This trend compels us to examine a clear industrial problem: who oversees how the software is utilized, rather than the program itself. Solutions for remote access, RMM and PSA Software are performing just what they were designed to. The true issue is that, from the suppliers developing the code to the MSPs deploying the agents, the IT channel has never come to a consensus on what responsible use entails.
Also Read: What is honeypotting?
Those numbers are honestly terrifying – a 277% increase in RMM misuse is a massive red flag. The irony is these tools are supposed to make IT management seamless, but they've become the go-to entry point for attackers. The real problem isn't the software itself, it's the lack of clear standards across the entire supply chain – from vendors to MSPs. Until we have a unified definition of responsible use, attackers will keep exploiting that gray area. If you're looking for more insights on securing remote access, I found this resource pretty eye-opening: https://highflybet.com.gr/